Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF SPVU NYSE

The Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF (Fund) is based on the S&P 500 Enhanced Value Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index tracks the performance of stocks in the S&P 500 Index that have the highest "value score." The Fund and Index are reconstituted and rebalanced twice a year on the third Fridays of June and December. Constituents are weighted by their market capitalization and their value score. As of 08/31/2025 the Fund had an overall rating of 4 stars out of 1077 funds and was rated 3 stars out of 1077 funds, 4 stars out of 1018 funds and N/A stars out of N/A funds for the 3-, 5- and 10- year periods, respectively. Source: Morningstar Inc. Ratings are based on a risk-adjusted return measure that accounts for variation in a fund's monthly performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. Open-end mutual funds and exchange-traded funds are considered a single population for comparison purposes. Ratings are calculated for funds with at least a three year history. The overall rating is derived from a weighted average of three-, five- and 10-year rating metrics, as applicable, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses. ©2025 Morningstar Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The top 10% of funds in a category receive five stars, the next 22.5% four stars, the next 35% three stars, the next 22.5% two stars and the bottom 10% one star. Ratings are subject to change monthly. Had fees not been waived and/or expenses reimbursed currently or in the past, the Morningstar rating would have been lower. Ratings for other share classes may differ due to different performance characteristics.